Is it possible to add a task with the "dd" command and not have to enter a due date?
Is it possible to add a task with the "dd" command and not have to enter a due date? I know you can use "asap" but I'm looking for a longer term task storage. I would like to collect all of my tasks so that they appear in the due page, and weekly I would choose the most important to schedule for the upcoming week. I have a lot of tasks that are back logged and are waiting to be scheduled.
Thanks!
Thanks!
Hello Andrew, could you probably process tasks not on non-due page but in some "Unscheduled" list? You can use a filter like due:none to show only tasks without due.
ReplyDeleteBest,
Kirill Maximov Hi Kirill, the filter "due:none" doesn't work for me. When I type "due:" in the filter bar, the only popup autocomplete suggestions are "overdue, asap, now, any, today, tomorrow, current week, next week, current month, next month". There is no "none". And if I forcibly type "none", then it doesn't apply any filtering by dates to my list at all. Please advise. Thanks!
ReplyDeleteHello Michael Durland , the completion was not updated yet to support due:none and due:any. But these commands should be supported for a list. Could you please send me URL of the page where it does not work?
ReplyDeleteThanks,
Kirill Maximov Sure thing, thanks. Here's an example: https://checkvist.com/checklists/687708/accept?secret=E0MyZEnNYIy4MI
ReplyDeleteThe item "Another item with a date ^today" still shows up even with the filter set to "due:none". I think it might be because the item is a child. The top-level items with dates are correctly filtered out. Thanks!
Michael Durland Thanks, I got it. Unfortunately, looks like this is a bug and it is rather non-trivial to fix :(
ReplyDeleteWe'll try to provide a fix later in this month, together with the next feature update.
Sorry, it takes longer than I hoped, but it is definitely to be fixed in the next server update.
ReplyDeleteHello,
ReplyDeleteCould you please check how it works on https://beta.checkvist.com - I hope I've fixed due:none there.
Thanks,
Kirill Maximov Now due:none does filter out sub-items with due dates. However, if there is a parent with no due date that has exactly one child that has a due date, then date:none also filters out the parent. I think it should still show the parent because the parent has no due date.
ReplyDeleteMichael Durland In Checkvist the filtering works in a way that if we show a parent node, we also show its sub-nodes (you can see that if you filter just by text).
ReplyDeleteBut, in this case, we'll also show sub-items with the specified Due - and it looks like a bug.
In which situation you think the behaviour you describe would be useful?
Thanks,
Kirill Maximov Sometimes it would be nice to see everything without a date. That is to either make sure everything has a date, or to look at those that don't matter when I do them (no hard due date). Filtering out any item that does not have a date would miss this search. This would mean the desire to show all dateless tasks, regardless of how many date or dateless children they have. I guess it depends on whether the logic is somewhat top-down or bottom up. I can see it can also get messy when there is an item with a date with both date and dateless children. Then should the parent with the date be shown in order to show the dateless children? I don't have a good answer. Whatever you think is best. Thanks.
ReplyDelete