Is versioning planned? That, and a diff, could kill google docs for collaboration (for me)

Comments

  1. Kirill Maximov (KIR)18 March 2018 at 11:54

    Hi, this is one of the most voted requests (I've seen you've voted), but we don't have close plans or any estimates to implement it yet.

    Checkvist offers daily backup of all of your lists in the PRO plan, but this is mostly for backup and not suitable for document comparison, for instance.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jose Quesada25 March 2018 at 03:49

    Kirill Maximov argh, that's a pity. For a (crappier overall) product that does this ok look at airstory.co. They have a timeline that one can drag to go to past versions.

    I imagine that would take serious architectural changes that may not work at all for checkvist. Something simpler would go a long way though.

    This is closely linked to undo (my guess). It we could save the undo history on a task, that would be wonderful too.

    Let's be honest, writing is mostly about battling with revisions :) This part is not well supported in checkvist, even though I adore mostly everything else.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jose Quesada25 March 2018 at 04:48

    nuclino does this too

    ReplyDelete
  4. Kirill Maximov (KIR)26 March 2018 at 11:56

    Hello Jose Quesada, thanks a lot for the reference to airstory.co and nuclino. We'll definitely take a look when we'll be going to implement it. Unfortunately, cannot promise anything regarding timeframe.

    Thanks again,

    ReplyDelete
  5. Jose Quesada31 March 2018 at 02:43

    One other thought: you guys have the sleleton for a chat app. If every 'task' is now a message, you are almost there. The main difference is that history is immutable in a chat. But I'm really tempted to use it like this for a while. It's already better than most chat offerings

    You would need to provide some simple user management though. This may help getting in the 'business' market, one company pays for a group of people. This is not possible now, right?

    And don't forget emojis :P Just kidding.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Kirill Maximov (KIR)4 April 2018 at 03:48

    Hello Jose, thanks for the suggestion, but at the moment we don't plan to add chat communications. Checkvist has quite a different focus. But, you're not alone in your request :) https://checkvist.uservoice.com/forums/2121-checkvist-web/suggestions/410608-add-a-little-chat-widget-like-in-gmail

    Regarding the user management, Checkvist offers some simple group plans and offers list sharing in batches: https://checkvist.com/auth/help#teamAccounts

    As for emojis, you can use UTF emojis, read more in the comments to this request: https://checkvist.uservoice.com/forums/2121-checkvist-web/suggestions/5690255-emoji-support

    Thanks :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Any Toggl users here?

Any Toggl users here? I'm putting together an integration so the toggl (Chrome extension) button ( https://github.com/toggl/toggl-button ) is displayed for tasks on a Checkvist list. It's dead simple (a few lines of javascript), but I'm slightly torn on the best way to handle one aspect: whether or not toggl is shown for a particular list. It can't be always-on, as it adds too much clutter for non-projecty lists (who wants a timer button for the carrots on their grocery list?). What I have now is that if any task on a list is tagged #toggl, then all tasks on that list will have the toggl button. A few alternatives I canvassed were: - display toggl buttons only on subtasks of a task tagged with #toggl - display toggl buttons only on focused (hoisted) tasks - find some other way to indicate that all of a list's tasks should have the button, eg. something encoded in the list's name I think what I have now is the most convenient of these (I don't want to hav...
Read more