Hi

Hi
Is it possible to group by common parent in due view?
cheers, sergej

Comments

  1. Kirill Maximov (KIR)14 September 2017 at 06:24

    Hi, you can group by list there, see a corresponding option in 'oo' menu.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sergej Kop14 September 2017 at 06:32

    Thank you Kirill. That's what i saw as well. but i think it's rather illogical to have the context underneath each entry instead of having the same hierarchical layout as in the list itself.

    example:

    now, if you group by list it looks like this:

    ASAP
    Projects
    make cake
    Under: birthday party > Todo
    make bowl
    Under: birthday party > Todo

    wouldn't it be much more logical if it looked like this:

    ASAP
    Projects
    birthday party > Todo
    make cake
    make bowl

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kirill Maximov (KIR)14 September 2017 at 10:02

    I understand your point, thanks.

    It is not quite obvious if this grouping brings much value, this requires extra research.
    For instance, this grouping would make harder to scan names of the tasks because they will be on different levels.

    In fact, we have such a request in our uservoice: checkvist.uservoice.com - Add an option to show task hierarchies on search pages

    May be we'll implement it one day, please vote!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It would be very handy to have a single operation to move an item to another list, and then replace the item with a...

It would be very handy to have a single operation to move an item to another list, and then replace the item with a link to that new location. Something like 'extract to existing list' as opposed to the current 'extract as an new list' My use case: I make a distinction between lists which contain mostly action/todo items (in which every item is a candidate for completion), and which are largely for reference/record. Sometimes I move at item from the former type of list to the latter, but want a link left behind. It's quite likely this is far too niche a feature to be worth implementing, but "if you don't ask you don't get" ;)
Read more