Something's changed?

Something's changed?

I have a curl script which was allowing me to add tasks to Checkvist really easily.

The script (unchanged) is now erroring:
curl: (92) HTTP/2 stream 1 was not closed cleanly: REFUSED_STREAM (err 7)

Any ideas anyone?

Comments

  1. Mark Dickens18 March 2017 at 09:22

    If I add --http1.1 to the curl command it works fine

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kirill Maximov (KIR)18 March 2017 at 10:19

    Strange, Checkvist should work with HTTP/2 protocol (curl key --http2). We haven't changed anything since January with this regard.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mark Dickens3 April 2017 at 01:23

    Finally got back to this...

    Auth using
    curl --http1.1 "https://checkvist.com/auth/login.json?username=&remote_key="

    Works but with --http2 I get "curl: (1) Unsupported protocol"

    ReplyDelete
  4. Kirill Maximov (KIR)3 April 2017 at 01:51

    Does your curl fresh enough to support http2? Is there --http2 option in curl --help output?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mark Dickens3 April 2017 at 03:13

    Hi Kirill Maximov,

    Yes, the version of curl I am using supports http2:

    -0, --http1.0 Use HTTP 1.0 (H)
    --http1.1 Use HTTP 1.1 (H)
    --http2 Use HTTP 2 (H)
    --http2-prior-knowledge Use HTTP 2 without HTTP/1.1 Upgrade (H)
    --ignore-content-length Ignore the HTTP Content-Length header

    I'm using curl in conjunction with autohotkey and I'm happy to use http1.1 but the scripting has started to fail (the auth request returns the auth key but autohotkey has started to fail to read the output.
    This is a me problem not a checkvist problem :) )

    Just not sure why curl --http2 fails but curl --http1.1 works




    ReplyDelete
  6. Kirill Maximov (KIR)3 April 2017 at 03:19

    I believe this is the explanation, the curl is broken a bit: simonecarletti.com - Using cURL with HTTP/2 on Mac OS X — Simone Carletti

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I'm really enjoy using checkvist, you are adding great features very quickly.

I'm really enjoy using checkvist, you are adding great features very quickly.  What I feel is missing is more use cases.  How are people using Checkvist?  What are some recommend workflows?  How many lists do you have? User Stories will not only help those of use already using Checkvist to be more effective, but attract more non-technical customers. I like to keep my lists at a minimum.  I only split out for sharing but I'd prefer not to. Here are my lists: * Inbox:  This is where zapier based integrations go.  I have Jira tickets and emails tagged with "!action" going to list which I process daily. * The List:  This is my primary list.  Everything is here.  I use sub-nodes for different areas. * Honey Do:  This is the list my wife and I share to make sure we know what we both want done around the house. * "Client Project" - I have a few Lists I share with clients (Free lance web developer). I"m looking to write a more detailed blog post. How are your l...
Read more

Hello friends

Hello friends, We are considering to change behaviour of move up/down command using ctrl+arrows for lists with hierarchy. The new approach is available on our beta site, https://beta.checkvist.com . Could you please try it out and tell us what you think? Thanks! https://beta.checkvist.com
Read more

Hello friends!

Hello friends! I'd like to ask for your opinion regarding multi-line text editing. This suggestion comes from one of our Russian-speaking customers Dolina Zamkova so here is a translated abstract of our email conversation. Current problem: When you write multi-line text, you must press 'Shift-Enter' first, then use 'Enter' to start a new line, then 'Ctrl-Enter' to submit the text. Wouldn't it be easier to have a setting that will allow using Enter to always write multi-line texts, and always submit on 'Ctrl-Enter', like you do it in text messengers? So we could add a new account-wide setting, on the Settings page: () Finish editing by pressing 'Ctrl-Enter' (convenient for multi-line text) What do you think? Do you write multi-line texts in Checkvist at all? Other thoughts of how we could make it better? :)
Read more