maybe a dumb question, but what is the purpose/meaning of an "invalidated" task?
Hello friends
Hello friends, Recently we've got a request to introduce a shortcut to move items to the first/last position on the current level of hierarchy: https://checkvist.uservoice.com/forums/2121-general/suggestions/15758854-shortcut-to-send-an-item-at-the-top-of-the-current And this bring me to a thought to use the current shortcut (Ctrl+Home/Ctrl+End) for this purpose. But with an extension - if an item is already on the top position on the current hierarchy level, Ctrl+Home would move item one level up (and put it at the beginning of this level). This will break the current behaviour (moving item to the beginning of the list), but probably will make this shortcut more useful. What do you think? https://checkvist.uservoice.com/forums/2121-general/suggestions/15758854-shortcut-to-send-an-item-at-the-top-of-the-current
I've wondered the same thing...
ReplyDeleteYou validate something when it's complete, by hitting space. To reverse that action, you hit shift/space. I'd suggest Kir change the term from "invalidate" to "un-validate" for clarity.
ReplyDeleteJim Leff That's not quite right: hitting space 'completes' a task (rendered by default as struck through). Invalidating it with shift+space puts it in the 'completed' part of the list (ie. it disappears if you hide completed), but decrements only the total tasks number, not the completed tasks. It gets rendered by default with italics.
ReplyDeleteI'm not quite sure what the use of it is. Perhaps it's for people who make serious use of the progress counter, offering a way to hide tasks without adding them to the 'completed' count?
The reference mentions invalidated tasks in the Confluence export, so they might exist primarily for interop.
ReplyDeletecheckvist.com - Checkvist: Reference
Hi everyone, initially 'invalidated' tasks were introduced to mark some tasks in the list as non-relevant at some context. I.e. they cannot be 'completed' in some situation, but we still want to keep them in the list due to some reason.
ReplyDeleteThey make sense if you have a template list of tasks (checklist), and copy this list over and over. This status excludes task from the progress counter, marks the list item italic, and such tasks are hidden in 'hide completed' mode.
This feature is not very useful for most people, but it was present since the very first version of Checkvist, and has its users.
Hope this clarifies things a bit :)
I use them for everything that won't or can't be completed. Mostly notes. Other than Checkvist notes, they can be moved around, nested, ... (i. e. they have all the great powers of tasks).
ReplyDelete