In Checkvist mobile on Android or ios devices, I find it difficult to tap and drag a task which has a link in it.

In Checkvist mobile on Android or ios devices, I find it difficult to tap and drag a task which has a link in it. It will usually assume I am trying to open the link instead of trying to select the task in order to move it. I have to tap for just long enough then start to move the task before it tries to open the link. Is there a best way to do this? Thanks.

Comments

  1. Kirill Maximov (KIR)29 October 2016 at 10:57

    Hi Alan, a tap on non-selected item should not open the link, but should only set a selection on it. The second tap on the link will open the link.

    To move an item which contains a link, the simplest way is to tap-and-hold on a part of the item which does not contain the link (some text nearby or padding near the link text).

    Hope this is helpful.

    ReplyDelete
  2. alan ggn29 October 2016 at 12:39

    Yes, I see now. Thank you for that very detailed explanation.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Any Toggl users here?

Any Toggl users here? I'm putting together an integration so the toggl (Chrome extension) button ( https://github.com/toggl/toggl-button ) is displayed for tasks on a Checkvist list. It's dead simple (a few lines of javascript), but I'm slightly torn on the best way to handle one aspect: whether or not toggl is shown for a particular list. It can't be always-on, as it adds too much clutter for non-projecty lists (who wants a timer button for the carrots on their grocery list?). What I have now is that if any task on a list is tagged #toggl, then all tasks on that list will have the toggl button. A few alternatives I canvassed were: - display toggl buttons only on subtasks of a task tagged with #toggl - display toggl buttons only on focused (hoisted) tasks - find some other way to indicate that all of a list's tasks should have the button, eg. something encoded in the list's name I think what I have now is the most convenient of these (I don't want to hav...
Read more