On https://beta.checkvist.com we're trying to change overdue due date presentation in a list - now real missed date...

On https://beta.checkvist.com we're trying to change overdue due date presentation in a list - now real missed date is shown instead of red 'overdue' text. It seems that it is more usable. What do you think?

Comments

  1. David Darmon11 March 2016 at 07:34

    Just perfect for me!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ralf Hauber11 March 2016 at 08:18

    Looks good, though it's a little harder to spot (scan) all overdue markers when there are also tags with backgound color (the long „overdue“ immediately caught the eye). No question, now there is more information in it. Wish there was a setting for the date format.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kirill Maximov (KIR)12 March 2016 at 11:57

    Ralf Hauber Thanks for the follow-up. BTW, for overdue you can also use 'due: overdue ' syntax for filter and search.
    Regarding the date format setting - why would you want it? We tried to made date syntax unambiguous.

    I really don't like settings which can be avoided :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ralf Hauber13 March 2016 at 00:38

    Filtering is not always an option. E. g. when I'm (re-)planning tasks, I need to see priority and due date at the same time. Those two are sometimes conflicting.

    In the old style, overdue tasks were easily scannable because of color and the (long) word which was always the same. In the new style, it's only the color. Not all dates in my lists are overdue. ;) I think I might turn to custom CSS to add an icon or some other style.

    Date formatting: I often use ISO 8601. It is language independent. It is easy to parse. For the long date format (that includes the year), the sequence 'year-month-day' is more convenient for me than 'month day, year'. In some countries the common sequence is 'day. month year' which swaps the first two and therefore can be confusing. For the export 'ex', you use ISO anyway.

    I agree that settings should be avoided. And a setting for the date is probably not the easiest, as you now have three formats: relative (like tomorrow), short (month day) and long (month day, year).

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kirill Maximov (KIR)13 March 2016 at 12:01

    Ralf Hauber Thanks for your feedback.

    I thought about adding an icon for overdue tasks in addition to red background, but decided that would be an overkill. You can always add such an icon for .dueDate.overdue CSS selector.

    About date format - our point was to have a clear and useful format for 90% of people who look at the list. It definitely should not be for a machine but a human :)
    We also show due date details in the tooltip for the due date element, but I understand that this requires some mouse moves :)

    Thanks again,

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ralf Hauber13 March 2016 at 15:36

    Oh, I didn't mean machines, only when I mentioned 'ex'. Maybe the term parsing was misleading: as a human, I also 'parse' what I read (identify structure and then give meaning to it).

    You know your 90 %, and if those are satisfied and don't expect localization, it's ok.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I'm really enjoy using checkvist, you are adding great features very quickly.

I'm really enjoy using checkvist, you are adding great features very quickly.  What I feel is missing is more use cases.  How are people using Checkvist?  What are some recommend workflows?  How many lists do you have? User Stories will not only help those of use already using Checkvist to be more effective, but attract more non-technical customers. I like to keep my lists at a minimum.  I only split out for sharing but I'd prefer not to. Here are my lists: * Inbox:  This is where zapier based integrations go.  I have Jira tickets and emails tagged with "!action" going to list which I process daily. * The List:  This is my primary list.  Everything is here.  I use sub-nodes for different areas. * Honey Do:  This is the list my wife and I share to make sure we know what we both want done around the house. * "Client Project" - I have a few Lists I share with clients (Free lance web developer). I"m looking to write a more detailed blog post. How are your l...
Read more

Hello friends

Hello friends, We are considering to change behaviour of move up/down command using ctrl+arrows for lists with hierarchy. The new approach is available on our beta site, https://beta.checkvist.com . Could you please try it out and tell us what you think? Thanks! https://beta.checkvist.com
Read more

Hello friends!

Hello friends! I'd like to ask for your opinion regarding multi-line text editing. This suggestion comes from one of our Russian-speaking customers Dolina Zamkova so here is a translated abstract of our email conversation. Current problem: When you write multi-line text, you must press 'Shift-Enter' first, then use 'Enter' to start a new line, then 'Ctrl-Enter' to submit the text. Wouldn't it be easier to have a setting that will allow using Enter to always write multi-line texts, and always submit on 'Ctrl-Enter', like you do it in text messengers? So we could add a new account-wide setting, on the Settings page: () Finish editing by pressing 'Ctrl-Enter' (convenient for multi-line text) What do you think? Do you write multi-line texts in Checkvist at all? Other thoughts of how we could make it better? :)
Read more