I LOVE CHECKVIST!

I LOVE CHECKVIST! But the mobile version makes me a little sad :-(  Any plans for further development of mobile Checkvist?  Please say yes...

Comments

  1. Derrick Hiatt21 May 2015 at 09:34

    I would second that

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jutta Albrecht21 May 2015 at 10:53

    Me too... the mobile version works but compared to the desktop version, I always feel a little “restricted”...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kirill Maximov (KIR)21 May 2015 at 13:45

    Yes, we have such plans. We spent some time on the desktop part of the tool, introduced multiple selection there. Now we plan to pay more attention to the mobile version.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Jim McGuire21 May 2015 at 14:17

    While the mobile version is "feature poor", those features which exist, really work!  This is critical.  I prefer a simple and dependable solution to one which has many bells and whistles, but doesn't necessarily work well. 
    I also love Checkvist.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kirill Maximov (KIR)21 May 2015 at 14:42

    Thanks, and Checkvist loves you :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jutta Albrecht21 May 2015 at 22:08

    Kirill Maximov great to hear that, thank you!

    My first comment ("the mobile version works") was not meant as criticism - it is stable and reliable, online AND offline... I guess I'm a little spoiled by the desktop version... ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Marc Renault22 May 2015 at 06:40

    Yes, perhaps like Jutta Albrecht I've been spoiled by such a spectacular desktop version.  Thanks, and looking forward to developments for mobile.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Jeff Clearwater13 August 2015 at 06:50

    A dedicated app please!  the mobile version seems like just a very unnatural way to use a task based app on a phone - why not a dedicated app?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Some things I miss from Checkvist when working in the browser on an iPad (without keyboard):

Some things I miss from Checkvist when working in the browser on an iPad (without keyboard): 1. The task menu (actions, aa) has no lc and "more" (which includes ex, for example). 2. I cannot invalidate a task (shift-space), or delete it. 3. For marking done/open, the swipe has to be carried out on the text of the task. For short entries (short word or even just a letter), this can be hard to do. These are exceptions, but why not allow swiping the whole task row?
Read more

Google Plus is shutting down, we are moving to Discuss.checkvist.com

Dear friends, As you probably know, Google+ is going to shut down in a couple of months. It was a decent platform for us for many years, but now we have to ask you to move to our new discussion forum - https://discuss.checkvist.com If you need to comment on your old posts in this Google+ forum, please, consider creating a corresponding topic in the new place and add a link to the old discussion. See you there!
Read more