Does it take some time for the "in:" filters to register task-closing?


Does it take some time for the "in:" filters to register task-closing?

Comments

  1. Kirill Maximov (KIR)3 October 2013 at 08:50

    No, the filtering should work instantly. Could you let me know how to reproduce this? It works in my tests.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Charlie Halpern-Hamu26 July 2014 at 21:32

    Yes, sorry I didn't respond before.  I've recreated the bug not even searching for a particular word or for when it was changed.  Just searching for "in: open", choosing an item from the search results, hitting the space bar right there in the search results, and then doing the search again.  Sometimes it takes a few back and forths from open to closed item and open to closed search, but then I get a result where the search is "in: closed", but the results show a bunch of gray text struck out closed items... and one black text / no strikeout open one.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kirill Maximov (KIR)27 July 2014 at 01:04

    Hello,
    When filtering, Checkvist sometimes shows sub-items of the found items, even if they didn't match the search criteria themselves. I.e. if you're looking of open items, the filter will show closed subitems of open items as well (greyed out). 
    If you want to hide closed list items from view entirely, use 'hide completed' option (hc shortcut).

    Does it explain the Checkvist filtering behaviour? Or I misunderstood you?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Charlie Halpern-Hamu27 July 2014 at 06:22

    No. There is no nesting involved here. The intended use case is to get a log of what I have completed recently. So I am searching for "in: closed". But I don't get items I just closed a few minutes ago. And I do get those items when I search for "in: open", even though they are correctly styled as closed. Experimenting with this bug, I can also get the reverse behaviour, with recently reopened items appearing in the results of a search for closed items.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I'm really enjoy using checkvist, you are adding great features very quickly.

I'm really enjoy using checkvist, you are adding great features very quickly.  What I feel is missing is more use cases.  How are people using Checkvist?  What are some recommend workflows?  How many lists do you have? User Stories will not only help those of use already using Checkvist to be more effective, but attract more non-technical customers. I like to keep my lists at a minimum.  I only split out for sharing but I'd prefer not to. Here are my lists: * Inbox:  This is where zapier based integrations go.  I have Jira tickets and emails tagged with "!action" going to list which I process daily. * The List:  This is my primary list.  Everything is here.  I use sub-nodes for different areas. * Honey Do:  This is the list my wife and I share to make sure we know what we both want done around the house. * "Client Project" - I have a few Lists I share with clients (Free lance web developer). I"m looking to write a more detailed blog post. How are your l...
Read more

Hello friends

Hello friends, We are considering to change behaviour of move up/down command using ctrl+arrows for lists with hierarchy. The new approach is available on our beta site, https://beta.checkvist.com . Could you please try it out and tell us what you think? Thanks! https://beta.checkvist.com
Read more

Hello friends!

Hello friends! I'd like to ask for your opinion regarding multi-line text editing. This suggestion comes from one of our Russian-speaking customers Dolina Zamkova so here is a translated abstract of our email conversation. Current problem: When you write multi-line text, you must press 'Shift-Enter' first, then use 'Enter' to start a new line, then 'Ctrl-Enter' to submit the text. Wouldn't it be easier to have a setting that will allow using Enter to always write multi-line texts, and always submit on 'Ctrl-Enter', like you do it in text messengers? So we could add a new account-wide setting, on the Settings page: () Finish editing by pressing 'Ctrl-Enter' (convenient for multi-line text) What do you think? Do you write multi-line texts in Checkvist at all? Other thoughts of how we could make it better? :)
Read more